Rationalisation of Tribunals in India


The decision to merge 8 of the existing 27 Tribunals to let only 19 remain, has stirred a hornet's nest in India.

Rationalisation of Tribunals in India

[ ##thumbs-o-up##  Share Testimonial here - make our day!]     [ ##certificate##  Volunteer for Bodhi Booster portal]

  1. Tribunals, merged! The recently passed Finance Bill 2017 has proposed sweeping changes and overhaul of the functioning of tribunals. Eight existing Tribunals are now merged into other existing Tribunals. Ex: the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) will now be merged into the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal [NCLAT]. So, appeals from orders passed by the CCI will now be heard by the NCLAT (a strange situation!)
  2. Why Tribunals? India has numerous “Tribunals” that look into matters pertaining to company law, environmental law, competition law, intellectual property law, employment disputes, censorship, taxation, customs, securities regulation, debt recovery, telecom disputes, consumer disputes, service issues pertaining to the civil and military personnel, claims against the railways and other regulatory disputes.
  3. Origin of Tribunals : These tribunals have proliferated ever since then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s infamous 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 was enacted during the emergency. The Amendment, among other things, sought the creation of tribunals under the Centre or the State to adjudicate on certain issues that were till then under the purview of India’s independent judiciary.
  4. Problems with this Reform? The real problems with these amendments (merger and abolition of tribunals) are, (1) the poor drafting of the Bill – The Finance Bill aims to reform a total of 27 tribunals. Of these, it seeks to shut down eight by merging them with the 19 remaining tribunals. This is a difficult job as each tribunal is set up under a different Act of Parliament.
  5. Problems with this Reform (2) The fact that the Centre is taking for itself powers related to appointment, removal and qualification criteria of judges appointed to these tribunals. The important aspect of Section 179 of the Finance Bill is its intention to transfer huge powers from the Parliament to the government. Most of the 19 tribunals targeted by this Bill are manned by a mix of judicial and technical members and the qualification and appointment criteria for these bodies has been laid down by Parliament. The Finance Bill effectively gives bureaucrats of the central government the power to draft the qualification and appointment criteria for a multitude of tribunals.
  6. Problems with this Reform (3) Another provision – Section 180 – effectively fires judges from nine existing tribunals with three months’ pay and allowances. While there are provisions for the support staff to be absorbed into existing tribunals, there is no safety net for the tribunal judges.  Legally speaking most of the legislations appointing judges to tribunals prohibit their service conditions from being changed after their appointments.
  7. When GoI is a litigant – While this proposal can lower administrative costs, ensuring specialisation and bringing in officials from diverse backgrounds will be imperative. This could pose a conflict of interest in cases where the government is a litigant. The rationalisation of tribunals is important at times, but this will lead to dilution of expertise and confusion.
  8. Do check out exams-focussed Confidence Booster series of learning resources, here!
  9. Deep Dive? Here and here are more reading resources on similar topics! 



Abrahamic religions,5,Agri-tech,4,Ancient history,2,Ancient sciences,1,Artforms and artists,1,Athletes and sportspersons,1,Aviation,2,Banking-credit-finance,14,Citizenship and immigration,11,Colonialism and imperialism,3,Commissions and Authorities,13,Companies and products,11,Constitutional and statutory roles,19,Corporates,11,Corruption and transparency,21,Crimes against women,4,Crop,1,Crops,3,Customs and traditions,5,Dance forms,1,Defence forces,18,Demography and prosperity,24,Demonetisation,12,Destitution and poverty,16,Dramatics,1,Eastern religions,4,Economic Survey,1,Economic treaties,8,Ecosystems,6,Education and employment,10,Educational institutions,5,Elections,11,Energy laws,3,Entrepreneurship and startups,5,Environment protection,8,Facts and numbers,13,Features of Indian economy,30,Fertilizers,3,Flora and fauna,1,Forests and resources,1,Formal and informal economy,12,Fossil fuels,2,GDP-GNP-PPP etc.,11,Gender inequality,6,Genocides,1,Global trade,17,Global warming,5,Government schemes,32,Habitat destruction,3,Healthcare and medicine,3,Higher education,5,Hinduism,5,Human and animal rights,2,IMF-WB-WTO-WHO-UNSC etc.,2,India's international relations,19,India’s international relations,2,Indian and world media,3,Indian history,12,Industries and services,25,Inflation,3,Infra projects and financing,8,Institutions and bodies,13,Intelligence and security,10,International law,5,Internet commerce,5,Inventions and discoveries,4,IPR,1,Irrigation,4,Jurisprudence,7,Knowledge economy,4,Land reforms and productivity,5,Legislature,14,LPG,4,Medieval history,1,Military and defence alliances,16,Military technology,6,Modern history,7,Modern technologies,7,Music,1,Natural disasters,2,New laws and amendments,26,News media,7,NGOs,1,Nuclear weapons,10,Oil and commodities,3,Oil economies,2,Organisations and treaties,7,Parks-reserves-sanctuaries,1,Parliament and assemblies,13,Persons and achievements,9,Pillars of science,3,Political bodies,3,Political parties and leaders,26,Political treaties,7,Pollution,8,Post-independence India,43,Poverty and hunger,8,Private bodies,4,Products and innovations,4,Professional sports,1,Protectionism and nationalism,18,Racism,3,Rainfall and Monsoon,1,Reformers,3,Regional conflicts,29,Regional leaders,20,Regulatory bodies,22,Renewable energy,3,Reservations and affirmative action,3,Revolutionaries,2,Rights and duties,5,Roads and railways,3,Scientists and thinkers,3,Separatism and insurgencies,4,Shipping and waterways,2,Space technology,1,Spirituality,6,Statistics,15,Super-powers,10,Taxation and revenues,21,Terrorist acts,7,Terrorist organisations and leaders,5,Tournaments and competitions,1,Trade,1,Trade barriers,8,Union budget,22,Warfare,15,World figures,30,World politics,13,World wars and conflicts,13,WTO and regional pacts,4,
Bodhi Saar: Rationalisation of Tribunals in India
Rationalisation of Tribunals in India
The decision to merge 8 of the existing 27 Tribunals to let only 19 remain, has stirred a hornet's nest in India.
Bodhi Saar
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow TO READ FULL BODHI... Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy